jeudi 1 octobre 2026

BREAKING :TRUMP ANNOUNCES THAT IRAN HAS …

 

President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other senior officials have been working through the last pieces of a possible agreement to end the war with Iran. The talks have not produced a signed pact. They have produced a narrower contest over language, sequencing, and what each side would have to give up first.

Rubio restated Washington’s central demand when a reporter asked about recent U.S. strikes on Iran: the Strait of Hormuz must be reopened “one way or the other.” Speaking during a trip to India, he said the waterway “have to be open, they’re going to be open.” Closing or obstructing it, he argued, is “unlawful,” “illegal,” “unsustainable for the world,” and “unacceptable.”

He also pointed to negotiations in Qatar. “There were some talks going on in Qatar today, so we’ll see if we can make progress,” Rubio said. Officials are still arguing over specific wording in an initial document, he added, and that process “will take a few days.” Trump’s position, as Rubio described it, is blunt: the president wants a deal, but “he’s either going to make a good deal or no deal.”

The diplomacy is unfolding against a still-active military backdrop. A senior U.S. military official said some of the dozens of American warplanes and nearly two dozen Navy warships enforcing a blockade of vessels trying to enter or leave Iranian ports in and around the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea were threatened by Iranian surface-to-air missiles. The force includes two aircraft carriers and their escorts. The official said the U.S. strikes were near the Iranian port and navy base at Bandar Abbas.

A cease-fire took effect about six weeks ago, but American and Iranian forces have continued to clash in other ways. Monday’s strikes came as Iranian officials gathered in Qatar for talks on ending the war, underscoring how close the military and diplomatic tracks remain.

Iran has offered a more cautious public reading of the same process. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said Tehran and Washington have reached understandings on many subjects in the negotiations, but he rejected the idea that a final deal is close. “It is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion,” he said at a weekly briefing. “But to say that this means the signing of an agreement is imminent—no one can make such a claim.” He also accused Washington of shifting its positions.

The terms under discussion, according to the account circulating around the talks, are familiar and tightly linked. In a final deal, Iran would have to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the United States lifting its blockade of the waterway. If Iran agreed to lessen nuclear enrichment, Washington would also be willing to ease sanctions. A source said most people involved agree on the basic ideas and that the Trump administration is pleased with the direction of the talks, even as officials keep working through the remaining specifics. The same official said Iran appears more open to making deals now than it did before the military operation.

That is the shape of the moment: enough common ground to keep mediators busy, not enough to announce an end to the war. The strait remains the immediate test. Global energy markets depend on it, and both sides treat control of the passage as leverage rather than a technical shipping issue. The blockade is the matching pressure from the American side. Nuclear limits and sanctions relief sit one step further out—possible, officials say, but only if the first exchange holds.

Rubio’s warning that the strait will be opened “one way or the other” leaves little doubt about Washington’s fallback if talks stall. Iran’s warning that nothing is imminent is an equally clear signal that Tehran will not be rushed into a signature. Between those two lines, Qatar is still carrying language back and forth. A few days of drafting will show whether the remaining disputes are drafting problems or the same old disagreements wearing new paper.

0 commentaires:

Enregistrer un commentaire